Answering
the "Replacement Theology" Critics (Part
1)
• Part
2 • Part
3 • Part 4
by Gary
DeMar
“Please unsubscribe me from all mail from
American Vision. Your replacement theology viewpoint is not in
accordance with Scripture.” -from an email received at
AV
Replacement
theology has become dispensationalism's latest prophetic boogeyman.
If you want to end a debate over eschatology, just charge your opponent
with holding to replacement theology. What is “replacement theology,” sometimes
called “supersessionism,” and why do dispensationalists
accuse non-dispensationalists of holding it? Here’s a typical
dispensational definition:
Replacement Theology: a theological
perspective that teaches that the Jews have been rejected by God and
are no longer God’s
Chosen People. Those who hold to this view disavow any ethnic future
for the Jewish people in connection with the biblical covenants, believing
that their spiritual destiny is either to perish or become a part of
the new religion that superseded Judaism (whether Christianity or Islam).1
“Replacement theology” is dispensationalism’s
trump card in any debate over eschatology because it implies anti-semitism.
Hal Lindsey attempted to use this card in his poorly researched and argued The
Road to Holocaust.2 He wove
an innovative tale implying that anyone who is not a dispensationalist
carries the seeds of anti-semitism within his or her prophetic system.
This would mean that every Christian prior to 1830 would have been theologically
anti-semitic although not personally anti-semtic.
As Peter Leithart and I point out in The Legacy of Hatred Continues,3 it’s
dispensationalists who hold to a form of replacement theology since they
believe that Israel does not have any prophetic significance this
side of the rapture! Prior to the rapture, in terms of dispensational
logic, the Church has replaced Israel. This is unquestionably true since
God’s prophetic plan for Israel has been postponed until the prophetic
time clock starts ticking again at the beginning of Daniel’s 70th
week which starts only after the Church is taken to heaven in the so-called
rapture. Until then, God is dealing redemptively with the Church. Am
I making this up? Consider the following by dispensationalist E. Schuyler
English:
An intercalary4 period
of history, after Christ’s death and resurrection and the destruction of Jerusalem
in A.D. 70, has intervened. This is the present age, the Church age.
. . . During this time God has not been dealing with Israel nationally,
for they have been blinded concerning God’s mercy in Christ. .
. . However, God will again deal with Israel as a nation. This will be
in Daniel’s seventieth week, a seven-year period yet to come.5
According
to English and every other dispensationalist, the Church has replaced
Israel until the rapture. The unfulfilled promises made to Israel are
not fulfilled until after the Church is taken off the earth. Thomas
Ice, one of dispensationalism’s rising stars, admits that
the Church replaces Israel this side of the rapture: “We dispensationalists
believe that the church has superseded Israel during the current church
age, but God has a future time in which He will restore national Israel ‘as
the institution for the administration of divine blessings to the world.’”6
Dispensationalists claim that their particular brand of eschatology
is the only prophetic system that gives Israel her proper place in redemptive
history. This is an odd thing to argue since two-thirds of the Jews will
be slaughtered during the post-rapture tribulation, and the world will
be nearly destroyed. Charles Ryrie writes in his book The Best is
Yet to Come that during this post-rapture period Israel will undergo “the
worst bloodbath in Jewish history.”7 The
book’s title doesn’t seem to very appropriate considering
that during this period of time most of the Jews will die! John Walvoord
follows a similar line of argument: “Israel is destined to
have a particular time of suffering which will eclipse any thing that
it has known in the past. . . . [T]he people of Israel . . . are placing
themselves within the vortex of this future whirlwind which will destroy
the majority of those living in the land of Palestine.”8 Arnold
Fruchtenbaum states that during the Great Tribulation “Israel will
suffer tremendous persecution (Matthew 24:15–28; Revelation 12:1–17).
As a result of this persecution of the Jewish people, two-thirds are
going to be killed.”9
During the time when Israel seems to be at peace with
the world, she is really under the domination of the antichrist who
will turn on her at the mid-point in the seven-year period. Israel
waits more than 2000 years for the promises finally to be fulfilled,
and before it happens, two-thirds of them are wiped out. Those who
are charged with holding a “replacement theology viewpoint” believe
in no inevitable future Jewish bloodbath. In fact, we believe that
the Jews will inevitably embrace Jesus as the Messiah this side of
the Second Coming. The fulfillment of Zechariah 13:8 is a past event.
It may have had its fulfillment in the events leading up to and including
the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. Contrary to dispensationalism’s
interpretation of the Olivet Discourse, Jesus' disciples warned the
Jewish nation for nearly forty years about the impending judgment (Matt.
3:7; 21:42–46;
22:1–14;
24:15–22). Those who believed Jesus’ words of warning were
delivered “from the wrath to come” (1 Thess. 1:10). Those
who continued to reject Jesus as the promised Messiah, even though they
had been warned for a generation (Matt. 24:34), “wrath has come
upon them to the utmost” (1 Thess. 2:16; cf. 1 Thess. 5:1–11;
2 Pet. 3:10–13).
Before critics of replacement theology throw stones, they need to take
a look at their own prophetic system and see its many lapses in theology
and logic.
Read Part
Two of this article...
1. Randall Price, Unholy War:
America, Israel and Radical Islam (Eugene, OR: Harvest House,
2001), 412.
2. Hal Lindsey, The Road to Holocaust (New
York: Bantam Books, 1989). The address for Bantam Books is 666 Fifth
Avenue, New York, New York.
3. Gary DeMar and Peter J. Leithart, The
Legacy of Hatred Continues: A Response to Hal Lindsey’s The
Road to Holocaust (Powder Springs, GA: American Vision, 1989).
4. Inserted into the calendar.
5. E. Schuyler English, A Companion
to the New Scofield Reference Bible (New York: Oxford University
Press, 1972), 135.
6. Thomas Ice, “The Israel of
God,” The Thomas Ice Collection: www.raptureready.com/featured/TheIsraelOfGod.html#_edn3
7. Charles C. Ryrie, The Best
is Yet to Come (Chicago, IL: Moody Press, 1981), 86.
8. John F. Walvoord, Israel in
Prophecy (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1962), 107, 113. Emphasis
added.
9. Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum, “The
Little Apocalypse of Zechariah,” The End Times Controversy:
The Second Coming Under Attack, eds. Tim LaHaye and Thomas Ice (Eugene,
OR: Harvest House, 2003), 262.
Gary DeMar is president of American Vision and the author of more than 20 books. His latest is Myths, Lies, and Half Truths.
Do you
appreciate this web site? If so, please remember American
Vision as part of your regular giving. Your contributions are tax
deductible and help us continue this vital ministry. Thank you! Make
a Donation |