American Vision

Search

search

Category

All Products

Apologetics

Apparel

Art & Music

Audio & Video

Bibles & Study Tools

Biographies

Christian Worldview

Clearance

Creation vs. Evolution

Culture & Ethics

Economics

Education

Eschatology

Family & Children

Films In View

Gary DeMar Resources

Government, Law, & Politics

History

Islam

MP3

New Resources

Specials

Theology

Sign Up For Daily Email & Get Free Audio CD...
Email:  

PRINTER FRIENDLY | EMAIL THIS PAGE TO A FRIEND!

Perspectives on Church Growth (Part 1) (Part 2) (Part 3)
by Joel McDurmon

You have seen them, and perhaps have been sickened by them: churches that look like malls, “worship centers” that look like shopping centers, complete with neon signs and sprawling parking lots. A few years ago I used to travel through Grapevine, Texas on a regular basis, where I would behold a behemoth megachurch of which I have still not seen the like. It gobbled up acres of otherwise beautiful Texan prairie, and only stood apart from the massive office complex across the highway because of its name placarded across its windowless gray front. There it was, in boldface type: “churchnamegoeshere,” all scrunched together with “.com.”

Just exactly what idea is conveyed by such commercialism? Has Christ at last employed American mall culture for His ends? Or have corporate creeps crept into church leadership? It is hard to tell. This three-part article intends to deal with some of the pros and cons of the modern church growth and seeker sensitive movements, to survey some of the literature involved, and to emphasize some surprising areas in which traditional churches would be wise to stop criticizing and start taking notes.

It is difficult, however, not to criticize from the outset. When looking at modern megachurches we see nothing, on the surface, but self-serving shadows of what church should be; shallow attempts by enterprising Christians trying to make the church relevant to American commercial culture. And the similarities with that culture are startling. The bottom lines for both mall and megachurches are the same: bigness, trendiness, multimedia, and money.

These are the complaints put forth by many critics of the so-called Church Growth Movement, also known as the seeker-friendly movement, an informal phenomenon that urges churches to seek cultural relevance as a means of boosting attendance and continuing ministry. But stepping back for a minute, I have to ask, what exactly is wrong with a church being big, using available technology or having lots of money? Absolutely nothing. The danger begins, however, with the lust for trendiness, which has properly been the focus of critics to differing degrees. Some have emphasized the pragmatism involved in making the comfort of unbelievers the standard for Christian worship, and the dilution of the Gospel that inevitably follows. Others have spied connections between Church Growth proponents and new age religious leaders which make the seeker-sensitivity appear to be a sinister scam. In these regards a few books have been published recently which I will review below, but first a few words of introduction about the Church Growth Movement itself.

Faces of Church Growth

The movement is dominated by a few representative personalities. One is Dr. Rick Warren, senior pastor of Saddleback Valley Community Church in Orange County, California, whose recent book The Purpose-Driven Life has become the one of the best-selling non-fiction books of all time. It could be said that his prior book, The Purpose Driven Church (PDC), is the “bible” of church growth. Selling millions of copies, it urges churches to replace organs with synthesizers and traditions with trends, and to employ demographic modeling in order to make local culture the focus of church atmosphere. Warren claims in the subtitle to PDC, to teach Growth Without Compromising Your Mission & Message. His critics deny he has succeeded, and they are in part correct, but there are a few things Warren has masterminded of which modern churches should take note. More on that later.

Another face in the seeker-friendly scene is the ever-smiling Joel Osteen, pastor of Lakewood Church in Houston, Texas. While some might inquire as to the cause of his incessant smiling on television, an informed viewer might conclude that behind that plasma-screen grin are royalties from the sale of 2.5 million copies of his book Your Best Life Now. While not known for church growth publications per se, his “God just wants you to be happy” sermons have certainly helped him to master the art of growth—so much so that Lakewood has taken over the old Houston Rockets’ basketball arena as a 16,000-seat church.1 Concerning Osteen’s masses, one reporter has noted that, “To keep them coming back, Lakewood offers free financial counseling, low-cost bulk food, even a ‘fidelity group’ for men with ‘sexual addictions.’”2 Osteen appears to be on to something, but just exactly how do we make sense of a phenomenon that seems to be selling out the Gospel on one hand, yet doing so much Christian service on the other?

We need discernment, which means we need prayer and study in order to produce a good critique. When it comes to the Church Growth phenomenon, there has been no shortage of critiques, but how good are they? Let us look at a few.

Church Growth: Spiritual Deceptions

The book that began my foray into this study is Decieved on Purpose: The New Age Implications of the Purpose Driven Church by Warren Smith. Smith is a freelance writer and former victim of the New Age movement. His spiritual journey (he is now a Christian) gives him a keen eye for spotting New Age deceptions, and his very well written book3 traces curious parallels and some overt connections between key New Age leaders and Rick Warren’s Purpose-Driven efforts. The most important of these connections involve pop-psychology and positive-thinking guru, Robert Schuller (of “Crystal Cathedral” fame), who greatly influenced Warren with his leadership seminars. Problem is, Schuller’s leadership methods revolve around “vision casting,” a variation of New Age meditation techniques. Smith describes one book which, “encouraged the reader to use guided visualization (now often called ‘vision casting’) and other metaphysical techniques to gain whatever it was they wanted. Pastors were encouraged to ‘visualize and dream bigger churches,’ or ‘a new mission field,’ or whatever else they thought would improve their church and ministry.”4

Schuller wrote the introduction to this particular book. As a result of this kind of thinking, “vision” statements are all the rage in modern leadership texts. In fact, the vision statement for Warren’s Saddleback Church goes so far as to claim that it is “inspired by God.”5 Smith goes on to reveal Schuller’s partnerings with New Age psychologist Gerald Jampolsky, and spirit medium Neale Donald Walsch, author of a spirit-channeled book, Conversations with God, and others. This same Schuller is a driving force behind Warren’s approach to ministry. Smith quotes a Christianity Today article as saying, “During [Rick Warren’s] last year in seminary, he and Kay drove west to visit Robert Schuller’s Institute for Church Growth. ‘We had a very stony ride out to the conference,’ she says, because such non-traditional ministry scared her to death. Schuller, though, won them over. ‘He had a profound influence on Rick,’ Kay Says. ‘We were captivated by his positive appeal to nonbelievers. I never looked back.’”6Smith goes on to show Schuller’s influence indeed, citing several instances where Warren repeats and even downright plagiarizes Schuller’s very words.

Smith continues citing New Age influences on Rick Warren, including the Bible translation called The Message. Translated by Eugene Peterson, The Message is a paraphrase translation which aims at smooth and comfortable language rather than accuracy. Strangely, Peterson replaces the familiar clause, “On earth as it is in heaven,” in the Lord’s Prayer with the explicit New Age phrase, “As above, so below.” He repeats the phrase in his translation of Colossians. This classic formulation for practitioners of magic and witchcraft erases the Creator-creation distinction and understands the universe, spiritual and material, as a continuum—a direct relation between God and man differing only in degree. While it may not sound like a big deal at first, for those versed in the history of New Age thought and occultism, the phrase signifies something very purposeful, and indeed as dangerous as denying the doctrine of God as the Christian church knows it. Smith adds, “if Rick Warren or anyone else says, ‘So What?’ I would say, ‘So how come?’”7 Exactly.

Another New Age leader Warren references is Bernie Siegel. Siegel is a surgeon who opened himself to New Age spirituality by “directed meditation” and received a spirit guide named “George.” Siegel went on to fuse New Age teachings with modern medicine and published a book along those lines. He openly endorses Neale Donald Walsch’s Conversations with God and another pop-New Age work called A Course in Miracles. Warren promotes Siegel as a life to be emulated with no explanation as to who Siegel is. Meanwhile, biblical examples such as Isaiah and Job are criticized by Warren. Am I missing something here? Why does “America’s Pastor,” as Warren is known, exalt New Age leaders uncritically and condemn biblical leaders resolutely?

This last example seems to be part of a character trait of Warren’s that disturbs me. He often quotes radical anti-Christian sources as authorities while passing over biblical truth that could have better made his point. While we should not be opposed to reading non-Christian thought, we certainly should not use it as the foundation of our thought. We must engage unbelievers but not be unequally yoked with them. Warren ignores this and thereby defies the biblical truth that bad company corrupts good morals. Among the unruly quotable cast Warren sidles to his aid are Aldous Huxley, a promoter of psychedelic drug-induced spirituality, and Anais Nin, an early twentieth-century pornographer famous for her tell-all diaries. While quoting people of this nature is not bad in itself, especially when writing an analysis or exposé, Warren cites them as sages for a Christian audience. Why not the Bible?

In Part 2 of this article, we will see some of the driving forces behind this and other aspects of the church growth movement, as well as review what some other contemporary authors have to say about it. Once we peel away some of the peculiarities of the movement as well as those of some of its critics, we will be in a position to benefit from our study.                                                         


1. William C. Symonds, Brian Grow, and John Cady, “Earthly Empires: How evangelical churches are borrowing from the business playbook” Businessweek Online, (May 23, 2005): www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_21/b3934001_mz001.htm. Since Symonds’s article, the deal went through.

2. Symonds, Grow, and Cady, “Earthly Empires: How evangelical churches are borrowing from the business playbook.”

3. Smith’s publisher, Mountain Stream Press, graciously sent me review copies of several of their available books on the New Age, including Smith’s spiritual autobiography The Light that was Dark: From New Age to Amazing Grace. I unfortunately can not review all of them but do recommend them as one resource for those affected by New Age spirituality.

4. Warren Smith, Deceived on Purpose: The New Age Implications of the Purpose Driven Church (Silverton, OR: Mountain Stream Press, 2004), 55.

5. Rick Warren, The Purpose Driven Church (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1995), 43.

6. Quoted in Smith, Deceived on Purpose, 104.

7. Smith, Deceived in Purpose, 34.


Do you appreciate this web site? If so, please remember American Vision as part of your regular giving. Your contributions are tax deductible and help us continue this vital ministry. Thank you! Make a Donation
 

Worldview Super Conference III

MP3's


© 2008 American Vision

1.800.628.9460
P.O. Box 220 | Powder Springs, GA | 30127